Hospitality Consulting, Tourism Consulting - PKF CanadaTrends and Research for the Canadian Accommodation Industry
Home PKF Consulting PKF Trends & Research PKF Hotel Realty Contact Us Canadian Accommodation Consulting

 

winter tourism – supply, demand and rate changes from 1995 to 2000 - are we gaining ground?

In 1995, Canada had a rooms inventory of approximately 314,000 rooms.  During the past five years, this inventory has grown by approximately 11% to 348,000 rooms in 2000 – a growth of 2.1% per annum.

Based on our Trends database, Canada sold about 174,000 rooms per day during Quarter 1 1995, resulting in a 55% occupancy during the winter months.  By 2000, demand levels improved by about 12% during the winter period – 1.5 percentage points ahead of supply growth.

During the balance of the year (Quarters 2, 3, 4), demand levels increased by about 10% from 1995 to 2000.  Therefore, Canada is seeing stronger growth rates nationally during Q1, as compared to Quarters 2, 3, and 4.

At first blush, these results look very encouraging in terms of Q1 growth rates.  However, the real test is in the absolute demand increase as measured by rooms sold.  Between 1995 and 2000, Canada sold 21,000 new room nights per day in Quarter 1.  However, during the balance of the year, Canada is also seeing the same level of demand growth – that is, an additional 21,000 new room nights per day.  Therefore, on a National basis, Canada is not losing ground in Quarter 1, but it is also not gaining ground compared to the balance of the year.

 

Seasonality patterns vary between urban markets and resort communities, with resorts impacted to a greater degree.  Urban markets derive their demand primarily from four sources, whereas resorts are dependent on two  primary sources of demand.  Generally speaking, urban markets attract about 35% of demand from the corporate market; 35% is leisure based; while 20% is meetings and convention, and the remaining 10% is Government and other discounted business.  Resort demand is generally 50% leisure based and 50% meetings and convention business, and as such are more susceptible to fluctuations in seasonality.

In terms of Average Daily rates, there was a $6.40 price differential between Winter and Annual ADR’s in 1995.  The Q1 1995 ADR was $77.95 as compared to $84.35 for the full year. 

By 2000, this gap had moved up marginally to over $8.00.  While average annual rates grew by 32% between 1995 and 2000, Q1 ADR in 2000 was $102.50, as compared to $111.14 in 2000 – a difference of $8.64.

Therefore, while we have seen demand growth in Quarter 1, the accommodation industry has not been able to close the price points between annual and Q1 results.  The challenge with winter tourism is not to discount rates in order to grow demand, but rather to attempt to grow the price points along with demand.

Some of the markets which have been successful in growing Quarter 1 rates, above the National average include:  Whistler, Alberta Resorts, Ottawa, Quebec City, Toronto and Montreal.

Fran Hohol, Principal

Pannell Kerr Forster

Hospitality Consulting